We need to tackle long term unemployment
Posted by Kate Green, MP for Stretford and Urmston, at 10:12, Fri 19 October 2012:
This week's unemployment figures made sobering reading. Although there's been a small fall in unemployment overall, longterm youth unemployment's at its highest level since 1997. In Stretford and Urmston, the rate has more than tripled over the past year.
I know this is a huge concern for young people locally, their families and their teachers. If we can't get young people into work at the very start of their adult lives, there are lifelong impacts. Many will become angry, demoralised and find it hard ever to settle into stable employment. And their chances of setting up home and getting their independence look very remote.
Some groups continue to fare especially badly. Young black men have far higher rates of worklessness than their white counterparts. Disabled people struggle to find work that matches their skills. Women's unemployment is at its highest for a quarter of a century. And what's the government's answer to all this? To slash rights at work.
So I've been very busy this week in parliament participating in the debates on the Infrastructure bill and on the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform bill. These bills are supposed to boost business and create jobs.
The infrastructure bill simply doesn't go far enough. It allows the government to provide guarantees to get infrastructure project moving, but guarantees alone won't make the difference, when what we need is vision, funding, and real determination to get projects moving. In Trafford, we have a number of projects with huge potential - at Carrington, or on Trafford Park. But there is still no progress on Partington town centre, and now I'm really alarmed to hear rumours that the Coop's pulled out, while the future of the bank's in question again as we hear that the sale of Royal Bank of Scotland branches to Santander's fallen through.
Neither the government nor Trafford council have an adequate infrastructure strategy. The new Infrastructure bill isn't up to the task. But what's much worse lies in the Enterprise bill. This bill slashes employment rights, like the right to have information from your employer if you believe you've been discriminated against, or the right to be protected from harassment by third parties at work. Huge fees will prevent ordinary workers from being able to take a case to an employment tribunal, and employers will be able to put pressure on employees to leave a company with possibly only a very modest payoff when there's a dispute.
The government seems to believe the reason we've got high unemployment is because workers have too many rights. Business doesn't think this - business organisations' responses to the consultation on the bill rejected many of the measures ministers have brought forward, or said they weren't required. In other countries, like Germany, strong workers' rights don't harm their economic performance. I'm really angry that workers are paying for government incompetence with the economy and narrow minded ideology, and I was proud to go into the debate to speak up for workers' rights.
Comments
If you are subscribed to HearFromYourMP in this constituency,
log in to post a reply.
Otherwise, if you live in the UK,
sign up in order to
HearFromYourMP.
HearFromYourMP
Posted by JANICE FLANAGAN, 16:49, Sat 27 October 2012: (Is this post abusive?) #
I am astounded on a daily basis of how the Coalition Government are eroding the rights of the working people which have been fought for over the past hundred years or so with blood sweat and tears! The cuts have hit the working population hard in the pocket. To add insult to injury when these cuts impact on the job market and companies have to make redundancies or close down because there is less money to spend those thrown onto the unemployment pile find that their rights to benefits to help them during these difficult times have been eroded! Talk about "kicking a man when he is down" Further cuts to benefits are possibly due next year! Families with more than two children will not receive help with any other children in the family? Children should not suffer because of the failure of the economy.
I was pleased to see that Mr Clegg at last showed he has a back bone and spoke out against the extra 10 billion of cuts proposed next year. I am also puzzled about why the under 25's are being targeted and will be denied housing benefits so they must stay at home with mummy and daddy?? Not everyone can fall back on their parents to support them through unemployment and illness. So what is the alternative? A cardboard box on the street? Also the proposed "Shares for Working Rights". How many people will be up for the 'boot' before the ink is dry? Which will give companies a chance to replace higher paid staff, those close to retirement, recently married women who may be thinking of starting a family ..the list is endless.
It is not acceptable to hit the poorest in our society and let the rich off the hook. I can't wait for the next General Election. Janice Flanagan